Home Articles Miscellaneous Anthrax update
Anthrax update PDF Print E-mail
Written by Nigel Brunsdon   
Wednesday, 24 February 2010 20:30

AnthraxAs the anthrax situation worsens and we get the first cases appearing in England (London and Blackpool) there is still a lot of confusion over the finer details of the outbreak, especially the details on the routes of drug administration.

This has lead to anger from user groups, as Alan J from the National Users Network said on their Facebook page:

"It would be most helpful if the HPA could give a breakdown of those infected by the contaminated heroin according to mode of ingestion..."

Well the information exists but for a number of reasons it's only being distributed via word of mouth, possibly because Health Protection Scotland (HPS) are worried that the information may make people feel safe using routes that later turn out to also be a risk.

NOTE: As I've previously mentioned on this site, it seems that ALL possible routes of administration are risky when dealing with heroin infected anthrax. Please bear that in mind when reading the following information. The best harm reduction advice is still to try to stop using heroin, either via self detox or substitute prescribing.

The following is information is being verbally disseminated to drugs workers in Scotland and was sent to me by a senior worker who wishs to remain anonymous (but who I trust) the worker felt that the information should be made more widely available.


There is no specific profile for the people who most likely to be at risk, the age range is late 20s to mid 50s. The majority (if not all) of those infected have been injectors. There has been one report of smoking from one of the victims, however he was also in receipt of a methadone script and may have minimised his injecting for fear of loosing his script, he had a recent history of injecting and was associating with known injectors, unfortunately no post-mortem was carried out (workers refused to, thinking they were at risk of infection) so there has been no way to confirm whether he was actually injecting.
So far the risk from smoking heroin is only theoretical, none of the confirmed cases or those who have died had anthrax via lungs or through inhalation, the anthrax was all through abscesses. There is an increased risk, in theory, if when smoking heroin you start inhaling as it's candying as you run the risk of inhaling powder rather than smoke. If inhaled the disease progression is very quick and almost always fatal. But this has not been the pattern.

21 out of the 23 people who have died injected into muscle, there is reason to believe one of the other two missed a vein, and the last I've already talked about above. There have also been cellulitis, necrotising fasciitis and gut bacteria present in abscesses associated with the anthrax infection, suggesting underlying untreated infection, poor hygiene and poor injecting practice (i.e. licking the needle before injecting). All of this increases the risk of fatality as the immune system is already compromised.

Things to avoid when injecting;

  • Injecting under skin
  • Injecting into muscle
  • Missing a vein or experiencing leakage is a risk factor in many of the confirmed cases
  • Excessive use of citric causes extra tissue and vein damage, increasing likelihood of infection
  • Injecting contaminated heroin into a vein increases the risk of systemic infection

Filters are unlikely to stop anthrax spores, there is a better chance of filtering out spores using the purpose made filters as they may be able to filter particulate matter to a small enough size. Anthrax spores will last a long time in a filter and can survive extremes of heat and cold, so dispose of filters after a single use.

There is minimal risk through intimate or sexual contact. Although there is a potential risk from touching skin lesions, especially open wounds. Avoid contact with leaking or dried out wounds of abscesses, keep them covered, clean up spillages with bleach or other suitable diluted disinfectant.

I think some of this information is not already out there and I hope it proves useful.


Again I would like to make it clear, as also mentioned in this text, that this does not mean smoking is a safe route of use for anthrax infected heroin. Inhalation anthrax leads to death in a far higher percentage of users than wound anthrax.

For more details on the anthrax outbreaks in Scotland you can visit Health Protection Scotland (HPS), for details for the rest of the UK you can visit the Health Protection Agency (HPA).

Last Updated on Thursday, 25 February 2010 08:25
 
Comments
Search
Michael   |2010-02-25 04:55:10
Hi Nigel

I was just putting some Anthrax info into a re-print of an injection guide when I read this. I guess like everybody I'm getting a bit confused now, as this information seems to contradict the official statements . I don't understand why it is being spread verbally and why there is this cloak and dagger approach - is it because they are so uncertain of facts or is it because of the Scottish Puritans objection to methadone?

Michael
Nigel Brunsdon   |2010-02-25 05:25:39
avatar I don't think it does contradict official statements. As far as I'm concerned there is really NO SAFE ROUTE for anthrax infected heroin (as I stated in the previous article on this site).

I think the reason that this hasn't been distributed via any means other than verbal is nothing to do with puritanism but is more to do with a fear of being sued by anyone who goes on to contract an infection though the inhalation route.

Its clear that this information makes it appear that IM and SC injecting is the risk factor in current cases, and I think the fear is that people will have seen it and think that this means smoking or oral use is safe (which is not necessary the case of course).

Both myself and the person who sent me this information obviously have a higher opinion of peoples abilities to understand information, although I understand the HPS concerns about making this public domain.
Alan J  - Thankyou!!!!   |2010-02-25 08:24:42
Dear Nigel,

Thankyou at last for diging out the kind of information that I feel we should have been appraised of as soon as it became avialable.

At least the information given empowers users to make a relatively informed choice.

Nothing in life is certain and life is never without the risk of harm, injury & or death, especially the life of us opiophiles accustomed to the use of opium and/or it's any salts nder the abberant conditions of prohibition.

However- the best one can aspire to do is dance according to the dice throws of the 'gods' (all genders)and reduce/minimise the risk of harm if given the inforation in an appropriate manner as exemplified in your article.

Should you consent I'd like to copy your text as is onto the NUN F'book page but only in a form you feel suitable and protects any identity's that could be at risk of disclosure etc.

Great work and very helpful- confirms what I have suspected- I doubt if the 'chaser' caught it via that route- very much indeed.

Best wishes: Alan J respect 2 you!!!!
NB Apols for typos-
Nigel Brunsdon   |2010-02-25 08:45:57
avatar Alan, I've already posted the article to the NUN page on facebook, as I realised it was information you'd been asking for for awhile.

If you need to quote from it in more detail please do but with a link back to here if possible.
Only registered users can write comments!

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

Banner
Please visit our sponsor

TwitterTwitter

Injecting Advice also has regular updates and information on our Twitter feed.

ForumDiscussion Forum

Injecting Advice.com now has its own discussion forum, anyone can view the forum and all registered members can contribute.

Overdose Workshop

Download and use our Overdose workshop for working with people around OD risk